As you will see my my signature block I have a 1994 C36. The engine has amazing low hours, less than 1000, for its age. I'm about to embark on a two-three month cruise down the SW Fl coast to the Keys and Bahamas, yes I am, and I'm doing anticipatory pre-emptive maintenance. I'm thinking of replacing all the engine cooling hoses and maybe even the fuel lines as well. Over the last few years I've replaced a couple of the engine hoses that were looking worn. But I wonder if I should not just go on and replace them all even though they look ok and the engine has the low hours. I guess I can't go wrong in do this but I've got plenty of other projects on the list and it would be nice to just put this one off until next year.
What's the collective wisdom please?
Capt. Sam Murphy
1994 Catalina 36, Hull 1327
Shoal draft, two cabin model.
Panama City, Florida
Sam
I too wondered about the hoses on my engine (looked to be original) so last year decided to change them out. They all visually looked ok, no cracks or bulges, but about what you'd expect for their age. I can say without a doubt the peace of mind was well worth the price. Went with the Trident 250 series hose and the Gates hose - see picture from another post for the bent piece at the front of the engine
Gary Smith
93 MK I, Hull #1231
Std rig; wing keel
M35A Oberdorfer conversion
Thanks Gary, In my heart I knew that replacing them was the smart move. I've already replaced the molded one in the front as it was looking worn, so, I'm moving replacing them all to the top of the list.
I appreciate your input.
Sam
Capt. Sam Murphy
1994 Catalina 36, Hull 1327
Shoal draft, two cabin model.
Panama City, Florida
Sam
When I removed my Heat exchanger for cleaning I found the sea water hose was full of growth. The hose looked great. I'm sure I was losing 30% of the flow.
Chuck Lennox
97 MKii Ventura Ca
Island Girl Hull #1611