This is from The Log, So Cal boating newspaper. Yes folks it means what that it says. If in California, you will have to be fully encapsulated or replaced your keel with iron or concrete as that idiot mentions. And you 36IA members outside California, don't feel too smug if your boat is in, say, Texas or Florida. Boneheaded petty bureaucrat regulators share ideas all the time and the more stupid, the better it seems. Your time may be coming soon enough!
California Department of Toxic Substances Proposes “Lead-free” Boating
Posted: 3/30/16
Read Comments (6 )
<Print Page>
By: Jessica Lepus - Sacramento as reported in The Log back in January, the California Department of Toxic Substances (CDTS) recently took issue with lead fishing weights and was promptly taken to task by the American Sportfishing Association president and CEO Mike Nussman.
Perhaps spurred on by the Flint Michigan lead contamination disaster, the CDTS is taking another look at alleged contamination in California waters. More ominously for boaters, a rather nondescript notice was recently posted on the CDTS as website announcing several public hearings to be held next month in Laguna Beach, Santa Barbara, and Lake Tahoe. The hearings are a prerequisite to the CDTS’s adoption of new “rules” which according to the website, “will regulate, restrict, and ultimately eliminate the deliberate introduction of lead and other heavy metals into the waters of this State.” The new regulations will, according to the website, make it a civil offense to knowingly introduce Lead and other heavy metals into State waters. Violators may be subject to civil fine of up to $25,000 per day, it adds.
In telephone interview with The Log, Acting Deputy Director of Toxic Substances Regulation, Jiang Qing said “The proposed rules do not make individual exceptions for specific uses. We have not seen the need to make exceptions because there are simply no safe levels of lead exposure.” When asked if the proposed rules would apply to vessels with underwater lead keels Queen replied I don't see why not given that safe alternative to lead do exist.” When advised that there are thousands of boats in California with lead keels, Qing replied “That's one of the issues we will have to look at and we will invite representatives from the marine industry and boaters to fully participate in the rulemaking process” she said.
“I think it's crazy that a boat owner would be liable for a huge find the minute they launched their boats.” says Rep. Eugene Ivanov (R, Murrieta). We intend to make sure bureaucrats do not take these serious issues to the extreme” said Ivanov. He said he has written to the Board of Toxic Substances Control and has “urged them to fully consider the impact of the proposed regulations on the marine industry and on individual voters.”
Marc & Susan Garcia
"Solla Sollew" #1473, Mk.II
San Buenaventura, Ca.
It's unfathomable that they could do this. They would have a much greater issue with abandoned boats if they carried through with this.
Phil L
Southern Cross
Channel Islands, CA
C36MKI #400
As someone who has spent much of his career working on the issue of (childhood) lead poisoning, this comes as a rather bizarre intersection between my professional and recreational pursuits!
However, I'm still trying to guess whether the original post was an April Fools joke or not (miss Steve Frost's postings in that vein!).
I have not researched this issue at all, so what I'm saying here is -- frankly -- just rank speculation / musings. But generally, in order for there to be a health/environmental issue with lead there must be some mechanism for it to become environmentally (and hence biologically) available. At first blush, I'm not seeing how lead from a keel that has (usually) multiple layers of paint on it is going to be somehow leaching into the environment (or at least to an extent that makes it harmful). OK, maybe when one of us negligently allows our boat to scrape across a rock (which, of course, we NEVER do, right?) it could release some lead, but otherwise I'm not sure how the keel that is encapsulated with bottom paint is going to present an active hazard.
But, again, I haven't researched this, so I could be 100% wrong....
Matthew Chachère
s/v ¡Que Chévere!
(Formerly 1985 C36 MKI #466 tall rig fin keel M25)
2006 Catalina Morgan 440 #30.
Homeported in eastern Long Island, NY